Sunday, October 12, 2014

EDUC 6713 - GAME Plan Reflection


My GAME Plan Reflection

            As I continue on with my professional career, I understand the importance of using assessment data to drive my instructional practices. This is something that I did not do very well early on in my career. However, with the implementation of No Child Left Behind, high stakes testing, and now our district’s new teacher evaluation system which bases part of my evaluation on students’ test scores, I know I must continue to improve in that area. With those thoughts in mind, I focused my first GAME Plan goal on using technology to track student progress:

Goal:
To utilize technology to track student progress on summative assessments to help students pinpoint areas of mastery and improvement.
NETS-T #1
2d. Provide students with multiple and varied formative and summative assessments aligned with content and technology standards, and use resulting data to inform learning and teaching.

There are two factors that made it difficult to assess whether or not this goal was achieved. First, being on sabbatical has been quite challenging in that it can be difficult to get other people to help you follow through on certain tasks. At times, I have had to try to make things happen from afar and that has been somewhat frustrating. Also, the beginning of the school year is a very tough time to track a lot of change as a result of a goal being implemented. With various beginning of the year testing and back to school activities, students are now just finally getting in to the swing of things. To date, students have only completed one paragraph assignment and so more data is needed to track progress over time. I am hoping that by November, students will have at least three completed paragraph assignments with graded information logged on to their spreadsheet. At that point, we should be able to do a better job of figuring out areas of weakness.
Once we figure out areas of needed improvement, I can see my students utilizing the GAME plan method to establish writing goals for themselves. Each individual student could utilize a writing journal (either online or in a notebook) and write a goal based on their areas of need (which will be determined from logging rubric information into the spreadsheet). Then, students could outline actions for accomplishing this goal, describe ways to monitor their progress, and finally evaluate the effectiveness of the goal after a month or two of instruction. Obviously, I think the GAME plan method fits nicely into the writing curriculum because each student has such a vast range of skills when it comes to their written work. By having students create their own GAME plan to address writing weaknesses, I will be able to differentiate instruction more appropriately. All of this can happen by creating a simple spreadsheet, having students track their own progress to look for data trends, and asking them to reflect on their strengths and needs to define goals for future improvement.
            
           My second goal was created due to the amount of work that both my students and I complete on the Internet:
Goal #2:
To model appropriate use of citing references on the Internet, and hold students accountable for using text, graphics, videos, and other media from the Internet by adding a “Citing References” section to their assignment rubrics.
NETS-T #2
4a. Advocate, model, and teach safe, legal, and ethical use of digital information and technology, including respect for copyright, intellectual property, and the appropriate documentation of sources.
The courses at Walden have taught me the need to give credit to others for their work. As a teacher, I had already understood the importance of this when conducting research and taught my students the importance of this as well. However, I never considered that when using images, movies, and other digital media found on the Internet, I was using someone else’s work and also needed to properly credit the source. This was one of those major ah ha moments, and I then knew I had to do something to stress the importance of digital citizenship. The International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) also has a list of Standards for Students (2007). Of the six technology standards for students, Standard 5 is focus on the digital citizenship and having “students understand human, cultural, and societal issues related to technology and practice legal and ethical behavior” (p. 2).
I have already begun to model this digital citizenship while creating presentations and other media formats for my students by citing all graphic images that have been taken from the Internet and used in the presentation. In EDUC 6712, Supporting Information Literacy and online Inquiry in the Classroom, we learned the importance of modeling various skills and concepts to students (Eagleton and Dobler, 2007). Modeling not only provides students with examples of expectations, but it gives students a frame of reference. Students are more likely to remember something if it is shown or demonstrated to them rather than just having them read about it or put it in the directions. Moving forward, this will continue to be a focus for both teacher and student-made presentations.       
One aspect of this particular goal that I may consider revising is the use of NoodleTools.com. My students have been taught this online tool from the moment they enter the middle school. They use it in all of their classes, and it is helpful for them to create a bibliography or reference list. While I understand that this is one of those technological tools that help students complete certain parts of a project, I can’t help but feel that students should be taught how to create reference lists on their own. With NoodleTools.com, students simply copy and paste the information into the site, and the program will create the reference list based on what was input. I have found that students do not really understand how to create a reference list by using this tool, and I feel like they need to know this skill in the future. Therefore, I need to determine if I want to continue to use NoodleTools.com for research projects. Also, if I stick with using it, do I find a way to cite graphics/images with the program? All of these thoughts need more consideration moving forward.
This course, like all other courses in Walden has taught me the continued need to integrate technology into my instructional practices. However, I do not need to use technology just to say I used technology. I need to look at my curriculum content, standards, objectives, and IEP goals and fine ways to use technology to address those points (Laureate Education, Inc., 2009a). I think I have done a fairly good job with this and find relevant activities that meet both student and curricular needs. The one problem I have is I feel the need to implement everything I learn, but that is just not possible. I need to stick to a few tools that work well for my instructional practices but also allow students to select tools to create their projects.
In this class, I have learned a lot about problem-based learning, online collaboration, and digital storytelling. For our last three application assignments, I believe I have developed an engaging unit focused on a problem-solution essay. Students must help come up with solutions to a current problem we are facing in our school (equal technology access) and write an essay proposing possible solutions. During the drafting process, students will use a blog to write daily reflections about their writing process while giving and receiving feedback from peers. The final step in the unit will have the students create a digital story to share with other teachers, students, and administrators asking for help in solving this problem.
Goal-setting is a critical component for not only students to move forward in their educational careers, but also for teachers to move forward in their professional careers. By continuing to implement the GAME plan method in my professional endeavors, I will be able to find ways to meet the needs of all the students in my classroom by understanding how they learn best, what makes them tick, and how to get them to meet state and national standards (Laureate Education, Inc., 2009b).



References
Eagleton, M. B., & Dobler, E. (2007). Reading the web: Strategies for Internet inquiry. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
International Society for Technology in Education. (2007). ISTE standards students. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/docs/pdfs/20-14_ISTE_Standards-S_PDF.pdf.
International Society for Technology in Education. (2008). National education standards for teachers (NETS-T). Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/standards/nets-for-teachers
Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2009a). Integrating technology across the content areas: Enriching content area learning experiences with technology, part 1. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2009b). Integrating technology across the content areas: Promoting self-directed learning with technology. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Mandy Derflers Blog. (2014, September 8). EDUC 6713 – My personal game plan. Retrieved from http://mandyderfler4.blogspot.com/2014/09/educ-6713-my-personal-game-plan.html.
ReadWriteThink.org. (n.d.). Exploring plagiarism, copyright, and paraphrasing. Retrieved from http://www.readwritethink.org/classroom-resources/lesson-plans/exploring-plagiarism-copyright-paraphrasing-1062.html?tab=4#tabs

Image References
Picture 1: http://leadershiptraq.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/reflection_28.jpg 
Picture 2: http://www.bottlesurf.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/goals3.jpg
Picture 3: https://fisher.osu.edu/blogs/macc-admissions/files/job-reference-check.jpg

Sunday, September 21, 2014

EDUC 6713 - Monitoring My GAME Plan


Monitoring My GAME Plan

            Being an effective teacher means monitoring and evaluating our lessons and units of instruction to make adaptations to ensure student success. We also try to teach our students these strategies so they can become self-sufficient learners as they continue on in their educational careers. We can also employ these strategies when setting our own goals in our personal and professional lives. This week, I have continued to monitor and evaluate my GAME plan to see what adjustments need to be made to make sure goals are achieved.
            Let us revisit the goals that were established in Week 2 of this course and dig a little deeper to see what has been accomplished thus far.

Goal #1:
To utilize technology to track student progress on summative assessments to help students pinpoint areas of mastery and improvement.
NETS-T #1
2d. Provide students with multiple and varied formative and summative assessments aligned with content and technology standards, and use resulting data to inform learning and teaching.

Finding Information/Resources Needed:
At this point, Google accounts have been created for all new and returning students so they can track their progress on paragraph assignments. The spreadsheet that I have created has also been shared with students so they can monitor their progress. Thus far, students have not entered any data because they are currently working on a paragraph writing unit and have yet to complete an assignment.

Changes/Modifications:
While this goal is centered around using technology to track progress, I have always found it is best practice to have a back-up plan. You never know when servers will be down or access to technology will be limited, so I would print out a copy of the spreadsheet for each student to keep in their writing folders.

What I have learned:
One of the aspects of this goal that I wanted to explore was to see if there was a better online tool, such as a gradebook or other tracking software that I could utilize to track progress rather than a Google Docs spreadsheet. After much exploration and reflection, I determined it was best to use the Google Docs account for several reasons. First, students use it for all school related projects, so they are familiar with the tools and applications. Second, all of our students already have Google Docs accounts so rather than adding another username and password (and website) for them to remember, I am going to stick with what works. Last, I wanted to explore the option of having parents access this spreadsheet. While parents do not have their own Google Docs account through our district, students can access their school accounts at home and share information with parents. The spreadsheets can also be printed out and shared with parents at conferences or IEP meetings.

New Questions:
After reviewing my plan, a new question I have is should I add information to the spreadsheet to address essay criteria? For now, the spreadsheet is set up to log progress on paragraph writing, which is an IEP goal for all of my students. We complete a paragraph writing activity at least once a month, so feedback and data would occur more often than essay feedback. (We complete 5 essays in a school year.) Further discussion with colleagues needs to occur to determine how to best address this.

Goal #2:
To model appropriate use of citing references on the Internet, and hold students accountable for using text, graphics, videos, and other media from the Internet by adding a “Citing References” section to their assignment rubrics.
NETS-T #2
4a. Advocate, model, and teach safe, legal, and ethical use of digital information and technology, including respect for copyright, intellectual property, and the appropriate documentation of sources.

Finding Information/Resources Needed:
In week 2’s blog, Thomas Rozborski gave a suggestion for a lesson plan to use to teach students how to cite references (Mandy Derfler’s Blog, 2014). The ReadWriteThink.org lesson (n.d.) would be a great lesson to start the year to stress the importance of citing references. It would address one of the actions I outlined in my original GAME Plan to create a lesson that teachers students how to cite references.

Changes/Modifications:
One of the first things I did to stress the importance of citing references is model the behavior in my own work. When I return to teaching, my first unit will be on writing an argumentative essay. I have already created two presentations for the unit through the Nearpod application and a Think Aloud activity. I went back and included citations for all images that I included in the presentations. In the past, my students would just take images from the Internet and not provide a link to that image, so I feel that is a very important adjustment to make.

What I have learned:
So far I have obtained five different rubrics that contain information about citing references when conducting research papers and using graphics/images from the Internet.

New Questions:
Now that I have a few rubrics to review, I need to synthesize the information to create a new category on our class rubrics. A new question I have from this information is should I make a separate category for citing text references and one for image references? Again, I will need to consult my special education colleagues as well as my school librarian for guidance.


            So far I believe my GAME plan is making progress in the right direction even though I am not in the school environment on a daily basis to make more of an impact. Suggestions are welcome!

References
International Society for Technology in Education. (2008). National education standards for teachers (NETS-T). Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/standards/nets-for-teachers
Mandy Derflers Blog. (2014, September 8). EDUC 6713 – My personal game plan. Retrieved from http://mandyderfler4.blogspot.com/2014/09/educ-6713-my-personal-game-plan.html.
ReadWriteThink.org. (n.d.). Exploring plagiarism, copyright, and paraphrasing. Retrieved from http://www.readwritethink.org/classroom-resources/lesson-plans/exploring-plagiarism-copyright-paraphrasing-1062.html?tab=4#tabs

Image References
Image 1 - Binoculars: http://contentd.fundsforngos.org/wp-content/uploads/monitoring-for-ngos.jpg 
Image 2 - Plan A/B: http://thumbs.gograph.com/gg61818216.jpg
Image 3 - Rubric: http://vsmarinebioproject.weebly.com/uploads/1/1/8/1/11817317/27934_orig.jpg



Sunday, September 14, 2014

EDUC 6713 - Carrying out My GAME Plan


Carrying out My GAME Plan

     

     In last week’s blog post, I developed a GAME plan for two areas of need that I feel would improve my teaching as well as student learning. Having the plan in place has helped me look forward to evaluating the effective needs of the goals and actions, but it has been difficult to implement the goals since I am on sabbatical. However, I have been able to review my GAME design to determine what else I need to do to implement the plan.

Goal #1:
To utilize technology to track student progress on summative assessments to help students pinpoint

areas of mastery and improvement.

NETS-T: 2d. Provide students with multiple and varied formative and summative assessments aligned with content and technology standards, and use resulting data to inform learning and teaching (ISTE, 2008).

Resources Needed:
-       Google Docs accounts for all of my students (as well as myself)
-       Computer access for all students when completing writing activities
-       Meet with Middle School technology coordinator to answer questions below

Additional Information Needed:
-       Is there a better online tool that can be used to track progress (other than a Google Spreadsheet)? I need to research other online “gradebook” tools to see if there is a better solution to using Google Spreadsheet. Things I need to consider are accessibility (can students obtain access), price (preferably FREE), ease of use, and functions of the gradebook.
-       Parent access – how can we make this accessible for parents to review progress? Or, do we want parents to have access to this information? Discuss these questions at a department meeting with special education colleagues to determine parent access.

Steps Taken Thus Far:
-       Revised rubric to identify specific skills that students will need to master
-       A Google Doc template was created for the paragraph rubric so students can access the rubric online and insert it into their final papers to submit to teacher.
-       “Paragraph Writing Grade Log” was created on a Google Spreadsheet so students can track their scores on each subcategory of the rubric


Goal #2:
To model appropriate use of citing references on the Internet, and hold students accountable for using text, graphics, videos, and other media from the Internet by adding a “Citing References” section to their assignment rubrics.


NETS-T:  4a. Advocate, model, and teach safe, legal, and ethical use of digital information and technology, including respect for copyright, intellectual property, and the appropriate documentation of sources (ISTE, 2008).

Resources Needed:
-       Various rubrics that contain criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of citing resources/references for papers/projects.
-       Meet with colleagues to discuss and determine criteria for rubric.
-       Meet with school librarian to create a lesson about citing information while conducting research/inquiry projects.

Additional Information Needed:
-       What is the proper procedure for students to request to use a graphic or other media file in their presentations?
-       Is there a district procedure for doing this?

Steps Taken Thus Far:
-       Reviewed Pennsylvania Department of Education (2014) Common Core standards to determine content standard addressed.
o   CC.1.4.8.W: Gather relevant information from multiple print and digital sources, using search terms effectively; assess the credibility and accuracy of each source; and quote or paraphrase the data and conclusions of others while avoiding plagiarism and following a standard format for citation (p. 25).

When reviewing this plan, the steps I have taken so far, and my additional resources/information, is there anything I am missing for my plan? Does anyone have any suggestions? Thanks for your feedback!

References
International Society for Technology in Education. (2008). National education standards for teachers (NETS-T). Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/standards/nets-for-teachers
Pennsylvania Department of Education. (2014, March 1). Academic standards for English language arts. Retrieved from http://static.pdesas.org/content/documents/PA%20Core%20Standards%20ELA%206-12%20March%202014.pdf

Image References
Image 1, Game Plan:  https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjUZk_1iRm3BGlNhoZrPf68wni4ZtxiKLhon1UD4cx2kw75qEc4gMPMSwA2XbRGR-M0_ICCW6Z6K3CyvV4OiWMKOFNN5CMu4Q2R5yG-BTOTwHW7eAKBH7nijxLFnu6dxQSXR_aVaC5zhJw/s1600/coach_clipart.jpg
Image 2, Spreadsheet: http://png-1.findicons.com/files/icons/1055/aqua_gloss/128/spreadsheet.png
Image 3, Computer:  https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh9qMx_ond1qDb5SVwAnMzZlKXoyfPDUVZBPQO0-CSebeurjHvh_qKLCC8Fq1zyqq45-nnICTtBwqrfwh9hcGgP6rpCIcgVYPJlzuSlX1xuE7XUvlXfRMaBrpp72x27nPOdrHQ3GTNd67cR/s320/computer_ethics.JPG

Monday, September 8, 2014

EDUC 6713 - My Personal GAME Plan


My Personal GAME Plan
 
Image Source: http://graycatenterprises.com/creating-a-branding-game-plan/

      After reviewing the International Society for Technology in Educations (2008) website, I determined two indicators in the National Education Standards for Teachers (NETS-T) that I would like to explore to gain more knowledge and confidence for my professional career. Using the GAME plan, I have outlined the steps I will take to make improvements in my professional career and help my students become prepared for a global work environment (Cennamo, Ross, & Ertmer, 2009).

NETS-T #1
2d. Provide students with multiple and varied formative and summative assessments aligned with content and technology standards, and use resulting data to inform learning and teaching.

Goal:
To utilize technology to track student progress on summative assessments to help students pinpoint areas of mastery and improvement.

http://content.timesjobs.com/assessment-benefits-both-employers-and-employees/ 
Rationale: I believe students need to understand the skills that they have mastered and the skills they need to improve. My rubrics are broken down in to specific criteria/skills, and in the past, students never really paid attention to their scores on those subcategories. They were just concerned with their overall score. By creating a spreadsheet where students have to chart their scores on each specific subcategory for each writing assignment, we can begin to track areas of need. This will help me differentiate instruction and students will have a better understanding of how they can improve their writing skills.

Actions:  
- Create a Google Docs template and add paragraph rubric to the document. Share with students so they can copy and paste it into their assignments when they share their completed product. (This was accomplished in the Week 1 assignment for this course.)

- Create a Google Docs template/spreadsheet and share with students so they can track their scores on each subcategory of the rubric. (This was accomplished in the Week 1 assignment for this course.)

Paragraph Writing Grade Log








Assignment Name:
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
Topic Sentence







Detail Sentences







Conclusion Sentence







Readability







Mechanics







Overall Score








- After the first writing assignment is scored and returned to students, explain how we will use the spreadsheet to track progress. Model and explain how to chart scores and allow students to input scores from their first assignment. Repeat this after each writing assignment.

Monitor:
- After the first four assignments, student should have ample data to review their scores to see any trends, discrepancies, and areas of improvement or mastery. To model this, show students a sample spreadsheet and have a class discussion about what the data tells us.

- Have students look at their own spreadsheet and highlight in bold any scores that are below a 3. (Those scores would be considered below proficiency level).

- Ask students to list those categories in their writing journal so they can review it during their next writing assignment.

- At the beginning of the next assignment, have students review categories of need from their writing journal. Work with students individually to focus on those skills for their next assignment.

Evaluate:
- After the first trimester, review students’ spreadsheets to see if they made any improvements to their subcategories in need.

- Continue to evaluate and review data throughout the year to help students understand what they need to work on. Also, work with students to show them what they have mastered so they can see they have accomplished their writing goals.


NETS-T #2
4a. Advocate, model, and teach safe, legal, and ethical use of digital information and technology, including respect for copyright, intellectual property, and the appropriate documentation of sources.

Goal:
To model appropriate use of citing references on the Internet, and hold students accountable for using text, graphics, videos, and other media from the Internet by adding a “Citing References” section to their assignment rubrics.
Image Source: http://www.ub.uio.no/fag/naturvitenskap-teknologi/bio/ressurser/

Rationale: I often create multimedia presentations for my classroom and use graphics and other media files from the Internet, but I rarely cite those references/files at the end of my presentations. My students do the same thing. I need to reinforce the need to cite where information was found so students can see the importance of giving credit to others for their hard work.

Action:
- Anytime I create a worksheet, multimedia presentation, or any other material for class where I use information from another resource, I must make sure I cite that resource to model citing references to students.

- Conduct a mini-lesson at the start of the school year to teach students the importance of citing references and show them how to do it.

- Add a section to project and essay rubrics entitled “Citing References” and develop criteria for the rubric. Review with students prior to each project, and make sure they understand they are responsible for citing all sources.

- Have school librarian observe students during research project to add further assistance as needed.
 
Monitor:
Review students’ projects (before they are submitted for final grade) to make sure they are citing resources. Reinforce and address any students who forget to cite their resources or do so incorrectly.

Evaluate:
Review students’ scores on the “Citing References” subcategory on their rubric to determine if any further instruction or review is needed.

           

References

Cennamo, K., Ross, J. & Ertmer, P. (2009). Technology integration for meaningful classroom use: A standards-based approach. (Laureate Education, Inc., Custom ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
International Society for Technology in Education. (2008). National education standards for teachers (NETS-T). Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/standards/nets-for-teachers